The Jammu and Kashmir Government has taken every strong move to curb the oxygen providers in the mechanism of terrorism in the valley in the stringent action against the anti-nationalists and those supporting the separatists narrative.
Mian Abdul Qayoom
The UT administration today has, for the first time since 1989, filed a dossier of “professional misconduct” and indulgence in secessionist activities against three leading lawyers, including the former president of the High Court bar association of Kashmir, Mian Abdul Qayoom, befor the Jammu and Kashmir High Court, seeking appropriate action against the Advocates Act, 1961.
Those who created fear psychosis
How distressing and disturbing is, those who are meant to provide justice among those who deserve it are indulged in creating an atmosphere of fear psychosis. Mian Abdul Qayoom and his group were terrorizing young lawyers to defend the cases related to the Seperatists, stone-pelters and over ground workers.
Since being the longest serving president High Court bar association Kashmir the other like minded lawyers followed the foot prints of him. Qayoom and other advocates of his ilk had maintained the self pro claimed attitude of being the only owners of HCBA Kashmir.
Changed outlook of HC Bar Association
Before the abrogation of special status of Jammu and Kashmir, the Judiciary of Kashmir were serving the interests that only favours Pakistan and Pakistan sponsored ideology and terrorism.
But post events Agust 5, 2019 the High Court bar association Kashmir has changed the outlook but the toxic ideology was still there.
Advocate Nazir Ronga
One among the three lawyers whose has surfaced in the dossier today advocate Nazir Ronga was booked under public safety act by the government of Jammu and Kashmir after the annulment of special articles Article 370 and 35 A. The documents provided against MR Ronga disclosed that he was affiliated with Mirwaiz Umar Farooq led Hurriyat conference.
Advocate GN Shaheen
Advocate GN Shaheen as per the allegations was involved in provoking people to go for violent protests in 2008 Amarnath shrine board land row. In addition to this, Shaheen also threatened advocates to observe complete pen down strike during the Hartal call given by the HCBA.
All the three advocates have served the High Court bar association as Presidents in other terms the HCBA acted as de-facto office because it was a general council constituent of the Seperatists All-Party Hurriyat Conference (APHC) from 1993 till the amalgamation’s split in 2003 pursuing Hurriyat’s ideology, holding demonstration for “Azadi” and euphemistically calling for a “resolution of the Kashmir dispute under the UN resolution or tripartite talks”.
The Killing of Advocate Babar Qadri
Following Advocate Babar Qadri’s assassination in Srinagar on 24 September 2020, the UT Government did not permit HCBA to hold it’s elections. Srinagar district magistrate observed that the association was allegedly pursuing Seperatists activity.
Based on the complaint against the three by Union Territory law secretary Achal Sethi and the Advocate General DC Raina, a dossier of the law enforce ment agency says that in 1990, Qayoom openly came out in support of the secessionist movements and presented a memorandum to UNMOGIP Headquarters at Sirinagar.
He was responsible for forming the HCBA, drafting it’s constitution and making it a constituent of all parties Hurriyat conference. It pointed out that HCBA’s constitution provided in its aims and objectives “to scure secession of J&K from Union of India” after detailed investigation carried out by law enforcement agency it was also came to notes that Qayoom had made a public statement openly supporting terrorists and had said that armed struggle should continue till the goal of AZADI was achieved.
Qayoom had attended a seminar in 2007 title “Qaid e Azam” organised by Muslim league to commemorate the birth of the Pakistani founder Mohammad Ali Jinnah.
Double Dealers Of Kashmir
The terror advocacy in Kashmir has been so throbbing that ,one could hardly understand Pakistan with its wily plans to grab the J&K had deepen it’s roots based on alienation in every single institution of Kashmir.
Be it education, health and medical sector, revenue or any other department Pakistan had strong catchment but no one could have imagined that the judiciary of Kashmir to have been caught in building and supporting the Pakistan/ separatists/terrorists narrative.
It is evident that the double dealers of Kashmir would take any extreme step to receive huge fundings from pakistan and india.take for instance the above mentioned three lawyers who were serving the High Capital Bar Association as Presidents and were identified as indian lawyers and draw monthly parks from india and on the other side Preaching, Practicing and implementing pakistan favoured idiology in the judiciary. It is obvious that the judiciary of kashmir also received huge funds from pakistan to construct and to spread the orientation of ideology that serves Pakistan.