The Centre has outlawed the Popular Front of India and all its affiliates for five years for indulging in unlawful activities, which are ‘prejudicial to the integrity, sovereignty and security of the country’. By banning the outfit, its members will be criminalised and its funds frozen
After carrying out two rounds of nationwide raids and arresting over 200 members and leaders, the Centre banned the Popular Front of India (PFI), declaring all its affiliated organisations as unlawful for the next five years.
As per the Centre’s notice, the PFI and its associates or affiliates have been indulging in unlawful activities, which are “prejudicial to the integrity, sovereignty and security of the country”, and that they have the potential to disturb public peace and communal harmon
“PFI and its associates or affiliates or fronts operate openly as a socio-economic, educational and political organisation but, they have been pursuing a secret agenda to radicalise a particular section of the society,” the government notification further read.
With the government’s latest action, the PFI has been added to the list of 42 banned terrorist organisations under Section 35 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
The Centre’s ban on PFI is applicable to its affiliates — Rehab India Foundation (RIF), Campus Front of India (CFI), All India Imams Council (AIIC), National Confederation of Human Rights Organization (NCHRO), National Women’s Front, Junior Front, Empower India Foundation and Rehab Foundation, Kerala.
As the Kerala-based organisation faces the action, let’s get a better understanding of how the Centre deems a group to be ‘unlawful’ and how does a ban work.
A group or outfit is banned by the Centre through the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).
The Centre in its notification stated that the PFI and its affiliates was an “unlawful association” with immediate effect through the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (37 of 1967).
A ban on PFI means has serious legal ramifications — membership to the association is criminalised, funds collected by the outfit are deemed illegal and frozen and also property of the organisation is forfeited.
The Centre can declare an outfit to be banned when it is found to be a terror organisation. Section 2(m) of the UAPA defines “terrorist organisation” as an organisation listed in the Schedule to the UAPA, or an organisation operating under the same name as an organisation so listed in the Schedule. As of today, 42 organisations, including Hizb-Ul-Mujahideen, Babbar Khalsa International, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, Students Islamic Movement of India, have been declared as terror organisations and banned in India. Section 35 of the UAPA gives the central government the power to declare an outfit to be a terror organisation “only if it believes that it is involved in terrorism”. The Schedule can be amended by the government to add or remove organisations from the list.
The law states that an organisation shall be deemed to be involved in terrorism if it —
(a) commits or participates in acts of terrorism, or
(b) prepares for terrorism, or
(c) promotes or encourages terrorism, or
(d) is otherwise involved in terrorism.
With the PFI being declared ‘unlawful’, the immediate effect is that its members and funding will be criminalised.
Section 38 of the UAPA states that a person who “associates himself, or professes to be associated, with a terrorist organisation with intention to further its activities, commits an offence relating to membership of a terrorist organisation” is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.
Section 20 of the UAPA also states that “any person who is a member of a terrorist gang or a terrorist organisation, which is involved in terrorist act, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.”
However, those who were part of the outfit before it was declared a terrorist organisation and didn’t take part in activities of the organisation at the time of its inclusion in the Schedule are exempted from legal action.
Simply put, a person who wasn’t active in the organisation at the time of it being “banned” won’t face legal action. Also, Section 24 of the UAPA also provides for forfeiture of proceeds of terrorism.
